THE V-SKATE
BACKGROUND
I just got out of the water at Narrabeen and was once again struck by the number of surfers still riding
undervolumed boards and obviously suffering: Up to their armpits in water,trouble competing for waves,
catching rails....Now--- if we were living in Mainland Mexico or El Salvador,places where well shaped
boards are hard to come by---then this might be understandable----but here, in the land of plenty---with
‘shapers’ a dime a dozen----well, for me as a designer----its an interesting spectacle.
Since releasing our Waterskate model in 2000 ----a board designed with volume and performance in
mind---we’ve been overun with demand. Since then---although various shaping punters have thrown their
hats into the ring too--- (more often than not just rounding off the noses a bit,going a bit wider,cutting in a
swallow maybe---but without much real thought or understanding involved)---the volume of your average
thruster has hardly changed---its still designed for the top 5% of surfers (70kg pros)--say 6’3" x 18 1/2" x
2 1/8"--and is then somehow expected to be suitable for the remaining 95%. How many 80kg+ surfers can
happily ride a board like that? To me, it seems obvious that most boards are still too narrow,too thin and
too rockered for your average surfer. The boom in sales of so called "Hybrids" and alternative shapes is
the obvious evidence for this.
DESIGN ORIGIN
This article describes a design I’ve been developing since early last summer---the V- SKATE---with the
name deriving from the spiral vee in the tail.
We found that whilst people were stoked in the advantages of the Waterskate over regular thrusters---that
nevertheless demand also existed for a board more closely related aesthetically ie-- with a pointed nose.
During this time we had continued to develop various aspects of the Waterskate---mostly related to bottom
contours and rail shape---and were looking to combine these improvements with a more conventional
planshape/outline.
The final catalyst for the design was Andrew Dunkin, 85kg, a decent surfer from Newcastle. He
won Tracks letter of the month and a Waterskate. When I called him to sort the order---he asked if I’d
shape him a high volume regular thruster instead. This request dovetailed nicely with our own intentions.
I shaped him a chunky 6’6" x 19 1/2" x 2 5/8" squash. After surfing it, his feedback was: "its the best
board I’ve ever had....fast,loose,stable,good paddler.....the board seems to kind of spring out of turns.....
really drivey...I think you’re onto something". We were off and running.
AIM
We wanted to design a board which synthesised significant volume, with current bottom, rail and fin
technology. Something easy to paddle and stable,like a well supported platform---and loose---but still
with drive and speed. An all round thruster primarily for surfers of 80kg+. How has this been achieved?
DESIGN BREAKDOWN
The guts of the design are in the planshape (outline),rocker (bottom curve),thickness distribution and their
relationship to one another.
Planshape:
On quick inspection,the V-SKATE outline seems fairly similar to your average board---but
looking a little closer, significant differences emerge. Dimensions on a typical 6’8" V-SKATE (pictured)
are 6’8" x 20 3/4" x 2 3/4"----now thats pretty far from average!! Compared with a regular board--the
V-SKATE also has significantly more area up front (as well as total area) and a subtle hip in the back
third ,whilst still maintaining a relatively constant outline curve.
Apart from the obvious paddling and stability benefits, the distribution of this area means that the board
can be surfed either off the front foot for linedrives when necessary----or from off the tail for tight arcs.
The slight outline hip also contributes to increased drive.
Rocker:
Compared to other boards---the V-SKATE has noticeably less rocker. With this increased wetted planing
area come many benefits: easier paddling,more drive and momentum over dead spots in the wave, and the
ability to surf the board from further forward when necessary.
However low rocker also has the potential to make a board quite stiff. With that in mind---the V-SKATE
has additional late tail rocker, which in concert with the pronounced outline curve and fin positioning,
maintains controlled looseness whilst simultaneously preserving the benefits of a flatter rocker.
The bottom shape used has been evolved over time in the Waterskate. Up front is a light roll under the
nose facilitating direction changes during full rail turns, and preventing catching whilst coming off the
top. This flattens and fades into a full width concave---promoting speed---then into a double concave in
the fin area. The advantages of strategically placed concaves are well known. In brief---they create lift---
friction reduction and thus increased speed. A spiral vee ensures that potential tracking problems
connected with the double concave and associated vee do not occur---and also adds a touch of extra tail lift
for looseness.
Thickness,Rails,Fins and Things:
In a sense--everything begins with flotation. Not enough,and right there
you’re up against it---too much and you’ve got a corky little boat. Typical V-SKATE thicknesses are
6’4" x 2 9/16", 6’6" x 2 5/8", 6’8" x 2 3/4". Looking at the foil---you can see that the distribution of this
foam is continuous---so that even though the thickest point is under the surfers chest---the nose and tail
are not wafer thin.
The tail in particular is pretty chunky. Why? Heavier surfers obviously need more resistance to lean on
through turns. Also--when fully sunk during a turn---the extra tail buoyancy has an effect similar to that
of a coiled spring---and provides a definite sensation of thrust/drive as you unweight.
Additional tail volume also helps keep the board up on top of the water in smaller gutless waves----
preventing it from catching/bogging down.
Rails are medium/low in volume. Soft in the nose and through centre---with a tucked under edge
becoming harder towards the tail. This rail set up provides responsiveness, forgiveness in chop and
drive/bite when necessary. Slight deck roll contributes to easy rail to rail transfer.
Fins and their positioning are a crucial and often overlooked aspect of design. However through vigorous
experimentation, we’ve acheived very predictable outcomes.
CONCLUSION
These boards are a lot of fun---combining easy paddling,high drive and turning possibilities with
multiple sweet spots. Although they appear to resemble a regular thruster---they are really a complex
synthesis of 80’s volume--- with current bottom,rail and fin theory.
Because of the additional level of volume---we recommend V-SKATES approximately 2"-3" shorter than
what a surfer is currently riding. Happy exploration.
Grant Miller
|